Louis Michael Seidman believes the Supreme Court's methodology of using 18th-century analogues to decide modern gun control cases is flawed and leads to 'bizarre sorts of historical inquiries'.

The Supreme Court's ruling on gun ownership for marijuana users did not address the constitutionality of prohibiting gun ownership for individuals addicted to illegal drugs.

The Supreme Court's ruling on marijuana users and gun rights did not address the constitutionality of prohibiting gun ownership for individuals addicted to illegal drugs.