Kyle Harrison

Defense technology analyst and investor associated with Contrary and Contrary Research.

Mentions

Appeared in

Discussed in

Key positions and views

The United States is dangerously unprepared for a large-scale conflict with China, which now holds industrial superiority and has rendered expensive US assets like aircraft carriers vulnerable.

The traditional US defense procurement system, based on cost-plus contracting and the PPBE framework, is fundamentally broken, stifles innovation, and results in unsustainable costs for inferior outcomes.

Anduril's business model—using private capital for R&D, fixed-cost contracts, and vertical integration—is the necessary solution to rebuild American military-industrial capacity and deliver superior technology faster.

Future military conflicts will be won by nations that master autonomous, software-defined systems, making the integration of AI into hardware the most critical technological frontier.

Critical civilian and military infrastructure, particularly the undersea data cables that carry $10 trillion in daily transactions, are highly vulnerable to attack by adversaries like Russia.

Podcast consensus on Harrison

Points of consensus

▶China's rise as an industrial and military power represents an existential threat to the United States, which is currently losing in wargame simulations and is unprepared for a potential conflict.Apr 2026

▶The US defense industrial base and procurement system are outdated and inefficient, characterized by massive cost overruns (e.g., F-35 program), bureaucratic hurdles (PPBE), and an inability to scale production for a major conflict.Apr 2026

▶Anduril represents a new, more efficient paradigm for the defense industry, utilizing private capital for R&D, fixed-cost contracts, and a software-first approach to disrupt incumbent prime contractors.Apr 2026

▶The nature of modern warfare is shifting towards autonomous systems and cost-effective drones, which have proven capable of inflicting disproportionate damage on expensive, legacy military assets, as seen in the Russia-Ukraine war.

Points of debate

▶Harrison contrasts the traditional cost-plus contracting model that leads to massive budget overruns, like the F-35 program, with Anduril's fixed-cost model, which aims to save the government money.Apr 2026

▶He highlights the tension between the US DoD's historical dominance in global R&D during the Cold War (36% of global total) and its current diminished role (less than 1%).Apr 2026

▶A key point of contrast is the failure of a tech giant like Microsoft to deliver on the $22 billion IVAS contract versus the ability of a newer company, Anduril, to take over and successfully execute the program.Apr 2026

▶Harrison presents the strategic dilemma between investing in multi-billion dollar legacy platforms like aircraft carriers, which are vulnerable to 'carrier killer' missiles, and pivoting to mass-produced, cheaper, autonomous systems.

Key themes

▶The Thucydides Trap and US-China CompetitionApr 2026

Harrison frames the current geopolitical landscape as a classic 'Thucydides Trap,' where a rising China, possessing industrial superiority, threatens the established power of the United States. He supports this by citing consistent US losses in wargame simulations since 2015 and China's development of asymmetric weapons like 'carrier killer' missiles.

This theme positions investment in advanced defense technology not merely as a market opportunity but as a critical national security imperative to alter the trajectory of a potential large-scale conflict that historical precedent suggests is likely.

▶Obsolescence of the US Defense Industrial BaseApr 2026

Harrison argues that the post-Cold War US defense industry operates on flawed assumptions and is crippled by bureaucratic systems like PPBE, introduced in the 1960s. This has resulted in extreme inefficiency, exemplified by the F-35 program's trillion-dollar potential cost and a munitions supply chain that would be depleted in just 11 days of conflict.

This critique creates a compelling narrative for investors that the defense sector is ripe for disruption, positioning new entrants like Anduril as essential innovators capable of solving fundamental structural problems that incumbents cannot.

▶Anduril's Disruptive Silicon Valley ModelApr 2026

Harrison presents Anduril as the antithesis of a traditional defense prime, highlighting its strategy of using internal funds for R&D, operating on a fixed-cost basis, and aiming to 'make billions by saving the government tens of billions.' This is further evidenced by its hiring of talent from companies like Tesla to build its own advanced manufacturing facilities.

Anduril's model represents a bet that Silicon Valley's principles of speed, efficiency, and vertical integration can outperform the entrenched, politically-optimized defense industry, offering a venture-style growth opportunity in a traditionally slow-moving sector.

▶The Ascendancy of Autonomous WarfareApr 2026

Harrison emphasizes the decisive shift toward software-defined, autonomous systems in modern warfare. He points to Ukraine's use of $1 million in drones to inflict $7 billion in damage on Russian assets as a prime example of this new paradigm, which Anduril addresses with its software-centric Lattice platform.

This theme signals a major technological inflection point where software and AI, not just hardware, are the primary drivers of military advantage, suggesting that companies mastering this integration will define the future of defense.

Source episodes

Sentiment over time

Not enough data for timeline

Changes over time

1950s-1960s

Harrison describes this as a period when the U.S. Department of Defense was a dominant force in global R&D, accounting for 36% of all spending. However, it was also when Secretary Robert McNamara introduced the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) system, which Harrison frames as a source of current bureaucratic inefficiency.

Post-Cold War

Asserts that U.S. military and industrial policy began operating on the 'incorrect assumption' that it was the world's sole great power, leading to strategic complacency and an atrophying of the industrial base.

c. 2015

Cites this as the approximate start date for the United States consistently losing in wargame simulations that model a conflict with China, marking a clear shift in the perceived military balance of power.

2017

Notes this as a pivotal year when Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that AI dominance would lead to world control. It was also the year Microsoft was competing for the IVAS contract, which would later be taken over by Anduril.

2022

Harrison points to this year as a moment of public acknowledgment of the threat, with President Biden naming China an existential threat. Concurrently, Anduril faced fundraising challenges but also secured the landmark $22 billion IVAS contract after Microsoft's struggles.

Suggested prompts

How does Anduril's fixed-cost, internally-funded R&D model challenge the political and economic incentives of the traditional cost-plus defense industry? &nearr;Given the projected 11-day munitions shortfall, what are the primary bottlenecks in the US defense industrial base that prevent rapid scaling, and how might companies like Anduril address them? &nearr;Harrison highlights the vulnerability of high-value assets like aircraft carriers and undersea cables. What does a resilient and distributed military infrastructure look like in this new threat environment? &nearr;If the US consistently loses wargame simulations against China, what specific technological and strategic shifts, beyond what Anduril offers, are necessary to regain a credible deterrent? &nearr;

Key concepts

Anduril Business Strategy 1 ep US-China Geopolitics 1 ep Defense Industry Inefficiency 1 ep Autonomous Systems & Drone Warfare 1 ep IVAS Contract 1 ep Russia-Ukraine War 1 ep US DoD Policy & History 1 ep Venture Capital & Fundraising 1 ep Undersea Infrastructure 1 ep

Notable quotes

“[0:06:45 -> 0:06:53] in their very first pitch deck, he said we are going to make billions of dollars by saving the government tens of billions of dollars of costs.”

Kyle Harrison · 100 Years of Military History That Explain Everything About Anduril

“[0:49:09 -> 0:49:20] And when you look at the existing munitions that we have, for example, if we were to engage in a large scale conflict, I think it's something like 11 days. Like we would run out of munitions in 11 days.”

Kyle Harrison · 100 Years of Military History That Explain Everything About Anduril

“[0:16:43 -> 0:16:56] the Chinese have developed missiles that they affectionately refer to as carrier killers. That literally, it's like, and these still might be fairly expensive missiles, right? These are 15, $20 million missiles, but they can destroy a multibillion dollar ship.”

Kyle Harrison · 100 Years of Military History That Explain Everything About Anduril

“[0:18:42 -> 0:19:07] They snuck a million dollars worth of drones into Russian territory. and then the drones basically took flight and were able to autonomously identify high-value targets and engaged and basically were responsible for like seven billion dollars of damage”

Kyle Harrison · 100 Years of Military History That Explain Everything About Anduril

Report last updated: May 4, 2026

Get started free

Back to Entities Intelligence Report