The Artemis program exemplifies a hybrid approach, using traditional cost-plus contracts for core systems like SLS and Orion, while simultaneously pioneering a service-based model for future components like lunar landers. This shift allows private companies like SpaceX to retain ownership of their vehicles, creating opportunities for commercial ventures like space tourism.
The primary scientific and economic justification for returning to the Moon is the presence of water ice at the south pole. The long-term plan involves mining this ice and converting it into hydrogen and oxygen, creating a refueling station on the Moon for deeper space missions.
Artemis II's core purpose is to test the life-support systems and flight capabilities of the Orion capsule and the performance of the SLS rocket. A key area of concern is the Orion heat shield, which experienced unexpected material loss during the uncrewed Artemis I mission, prompting a change in the reentry trajectory for this flight.
While NASA aims to be an anchor tenant for a future lunar economy, the actual business case for commercial activities on the Moon is weak and hypothetical. Unlike the proven market for Earth-orbiting satellites (e.g., Starlink), it is unclear if a non-governmental market exists for services like lunar landers or resource extraction.
Keep pulling the thread on Lauren Grush.