Market-cap weighted indexes like the S&P 500 have inherent flaws, including performance drag from rebalancing (approx.
15 bps/year) and a tendency to buy stocks after they have significantly appreciated.
The increasing market concentration in a few mega-cap stocks (e.g., the "Magnificent Seven") heightens risk for investors in traditional cap-weighted funds.
Fundamental indexing, which weights companies by economic footprint (sales, profits, dividends, etc.) rather than market price, offers a systematic value tilt and a 'rebalancing alpha'.
The Research Affiliates Fundamental Index (RAFI) has historically outperformed cap-weighted value indexes by 2-2.5% annually, demonstrating a more effective way to capture the value premium.
12 quotes
Concerns Raised
Increasing market concentration risk in cap-weighted indexes like the S&P 500.
Structural performance drag in passive indexes caused by rebalancing rules for additions and deletions.
The tendency of cap-weighting to overweight stocks that have become expensive and underweight those that are cheap.
The long-term underperformance of traditional cap-weighted value strategies.
Opportunities Identified
Capturing a 'rebalancing alpha' by systematically trimming appreciated stocks and adding to depreciated ones via a non-price-weighted index.
Achieving superior long-term performance (2-2.5% annually) compared to cap-weighted value indexes by using a fundamental weighting methodology.
Reducing portfolio risk by diversifying away from the heavy concentration of mega-cap growth stocks.
Investing in a portfolio that more closely reflects the composition of the real economy rather than market sentiment.