The investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell is presented as a politically motivated effort by the executive branch to target a perceived adversary. A judge found 'a mountain of evidence' that the probe was a pretext to pressure Powell on interest rates, illustrating the use of legal mechanisms for political ends.
Leaked memos on the Clean Power Plan decision reveal the Supreme Court's increasing use of its emergency 'shadow docket' to make major policy decisions without full briefings or arguments. Chief Justice Roberts is shown as the driving force, motivated by the regulation's economic impact, contradicting his public persona as a neutral 'umpire'.
The Fifth Circuit's ruling on displaying the Ten Commandments in schools demonstrates a lower court's willingness to discard the long-standing 'Lemon Test' in favor of the Supreme Court's new, more ambiguous 'history and tradition' standard. The court argued that decades of precedent were no longer controlling.
The narrative details multiple pressures on the Federal Reserve, including a pretextual criminal investigation into its Chair and a pending Supreme Court case on the President's power to fire a Fed governor. These events highlight the vulnerability of the central bank to political interference.
The discussion of leaked memos regarding the Clean Power Plan, following the earlier Dobbs leak, points to a significant breakdown of confidentiality and collegiality within the Supreme Court. This suggests deep internal friction and a departure from the Court's historical norms of secrecy and unity.
Keep pulling the thread on Weekend Law.