government is refunding billions in tariffs collected under the IEPA after a Supreme Court ruling, while simultaneously defending new, temporary Section 122 tariffs in federal court.
The administration is using the temporary Section 122 tariffs as a stopgap measure, with plans to implement more durable tariff authorities like Section 301 and Section 232 as early as July.
A separate legal analysis covers the wave of partisan gerrymandering and redistricting efforts in various states, highlighting the legal challenges and their potential to shift the balance of power in Congress.
The administration's unprecedented effort to obtain state voter rolls is facing widespread, bipartisan state resistance and has been consistently rejected by federal courts, raising questions of federal overreach.
9 quotes
Concerns Raised
Continued trade policy uncertainty due to the use of temporary tariffs (Section 122) and pending legal appeals.
The potential for chaotic elections and voter confusion resulting from last-minute, legally contested redistricting in several states.
The administration's pursuit of sensitive voter data raises significant privacy and federal overreach concerns.
Opportunities Identified
Importers can claim refunds for billions of dollars in illegally collected IEPA tariffs.
Legal challenges based on state constitutions (e.g., in Florida) may offer a viable path to combat partisan gerrymandering where federal avenues are closed.