Keep pulling the thread on David Super.
As part of a settlement to end President Trump's $30 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service, his Justice Department created a $1.8 billion fund to pay victims of alleged 'government weaponization'.
The settlement creating the $1.8 billion 'government weaponization' fund was not approved by a judge.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche did not rule out the possibility that individuals who attacked police at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th could receive payments from the 'government weaponization' fund.
The lawsuit between President Trump and the Internal Revenue Service is a 'textbook example of collusive litigation' because the plaintiff and defendant are both controlled by Donald Trump.
The creation of the 'government weaponization' fund is an unconstitutional usurpation of Congress's 'power of the purse' because it establishes a new program without congressional authorization or appropriation.
All five members of the committee overseeing the $1.776 billion 'government weaponization' fund will be appointed by the President or Attorney General without requiring Senate confirmation.
The President possesses the authority to fire and replace any member of the committee overseeing the $1.776 billion 'government weaponization' fund at will, making the committee completely subservient.
The Trump administration's use of the Judgment Fund for the settlement is legally invalid because the fund is restricted to settlements from non-collusive litigation.
As part of the settlement deal, the U.S. government agreed to permanently drop tax claims against President Donald Trump.
The 'government weaponization' fund is not legally eligible for payment from the Judgment Fund because the settlement papers do not specify the $1.776 billion amount mentioned in press releases.
Payments from the 'government weaponization' fund are considered felonies under the Anti-Deficiency Act because they are made without a valid congressional appropriation.
Rank-and-file officials at the U.S. Treasury or Department of Justice who help administer the 'government weaponization' fund face personal criminal liability for violating the Anti-Deficiency Act.