Keep pulling the thread on Bloomberg Law.
The United States has announced an indictment charging former Cuban President Raúl Castro and others with conspiracy to kill U.S. nationals.
Former Cuban President Raúl Castro is accused of ordering the downing of two civilian planes from the exile group Brothers to the Rescue 30 years ago, killing four people.
In January, U.S. forces captured former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to face drug charges in New York.
Senate Republicans have expressed opposition to President Trump's proposed $1.5 billion fund to compensate political allies claiming to be victims of "government weaponization."
Disagreements among Republican lawmakers over funding for President Trump's "anti-weaponization" fund and a White House ballroom caused them to abandon plans to pass a $72 billion partisan immigration enforcement package before the Memorial Day recess.
Capitol Police officers Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges have filed a lawsuit to block the creation of the government's "anti-weaponization" fund.
The Department of Justice, under Acting Attorney General Todd Blanch, released an addendum that permanently bars the U.S. government from prosecuting or pursuing pending tax claims against President Trump, his family, and his businesses.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanch stated he expects Raúl Castro to appear in the U.S. "by his own will or by another way," implying potential forcible extraction.
The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the state of Alabama in the case of Joseph Clinton Smith, leaving in place a lower court ruling that found him intellectually disabled and thus ineligible for execution.
The indictment of Raúl Castro is fueling speculation that the U.S. is preparing to launch military action against Cuba.
A dissent authored by Justice Samuel Alito argued that courts, rather than clinical experts, should be responsible for determining the criteria for intellectual disability in capital cases.
Senator James Lankford questioned the proposed "anti-weaponization" fund, expressing concern that it could pay taxpayer money to individuals who assaulted police officers during the January 6th Capitol riot.