The Commerce Department has completed its Section 232 investigation into whether polysilicon imports threaten national security, and the president has 90 days to decide on potential relief.

The Court of International Trade struck down the 10% universal tariffs imposed under Section 122 in a 2-to-1 decision.

The U.S. Trade Representative announced potential new tariffs of 25% on Brazil due to unreasonable practices under Section 301.

The recent summit between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping yielded modest outcomes, with discussions of a potential board of trade but no major developments.

The Trump administration is expected to replace the expiring Section 122 tariffs with new tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act, aiming to have them in place by July 24th.

The Trump administration has initiated about a dozen Section 232 national security investigations in the last year, leading to tariffs on goods like wood products, copper, and furniture.

Customs and Border Protection has refunded or is processing refunds for about $85 billion in AIPA tariffs for entries that were never finalized, but claims it lacks authority to refund finalized entri...

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows a president to impose a temporary import tariff of up to 15% for a maximum period of 150 days.

The new Section 301 investigations are examining overproduction and overcapacity in 27 countries.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection will launch the first phase of its new electronic tariff refund system, CAPE, on April 20th.

The Trump administration has initiated new investigations under Section 301 of the trade laws as a potential alternative for imposing tariffs.

President Trump has suggested he might increase the tariffs imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 from 10% to 15%.

Timothy Brightbill believes it is unlikely that legal appeals concerning the Section 122 tariffs will conclude before the tariffs expire around July 24th.

A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Costco by customers seeking refunds for higher prices paid due to tariffs, should Costco itself receive a tariff refund.

The new Section 301 investigations are examining forced labor laws in 60 countries.

The legal challenge to the Section 122 tariffs argues that the U.S. has a trade deficit, not a balance of payments deficit, which is required by the law.

More than 3,000 companies have sued the U.S. government to seek refunds for tariffs paid under the overturned International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPA).